Understanding Physiological Resistance
Despite technological advancements, humans resist change due to a primal survival instinct, where the brain's amygdala perceives novelty as a threat. This triggers a stress response, hindering rational thought and making "conscious, directed" change difficult. This physiological resistance manifests in daily routines, company transformations, and even personal loss. This post emphasizes that resistance to new technologies like AI isn't always logical; it's the brain's aversion to breaking established patterns and a perceived loss of control. It concludes with some suggestions on how to adapt.
It’s 2025. We're living in an era of unprecedented technological advancement, with AI promising to redefine everything from our daily commutes to our deepest intellectual pursuits. Yet, here we are, still talking about change management. You would have thought that we humans would have mastered the art of adaptation by now? Considering change is the very ebb and flow of our very existence - from the cellular level to the grandest evolutionary shifts, why are we still grappling with getting comfortable with change?
The uncomfortable truth is, when it comes to conscious, directed change, our brains often default to resistance. Why? Because we’re wired for survival, and anything new is, by definition, an unknown, a potential threat.
Despite living in a world of constant flux, our physiological response to change often mirrors our ancestors' reaction to a saber-toothed tiger. When faced with the unfamiliar, our amygdala, the brain's alarm system, goes into overdrive. It perceives novelty as danger, triggering a "fight, flight, or freeze" response. This isn't just an emotional reaction; it’s a cascade of neurochemical events. Stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline flood our system, narrowing our focus and making us crave routine and predictability. Our prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive functions like planning and rational thought, can become less effective under this stress, making it harder to process new information and embrace new ways of working.
Think about it: even a minor disruption to your morning routine can throw you off. Now multiply that by the scale of a company-wide digital transformation, or a life-changing event.
I have seen this play out countless times over the years with our internal WNDYR team. It ramps up when we challenge each other to relook at the way we work, when we promote someone into a new position, or when we change a process and implement a new technology. Despite working sessions and constant clear communication, the initial days of change are met with groans and grumbles. “Why can't we just stick with the old system?” “This new interface is clunky!” “I don’t like how this works!” “It takes so much more time!” are some common push-backs we hear. But this isn’t (or seldom is) about a new platform's capabilities, or a speed issue. It’s the brain's natural aversion to breaking established neural pathways. The sheer cognitive load of learning something new, combined with the perceived loss of control, triggered that physiological resistance. And we all experience it.
Similarly, when we engage with clients through our Customer Experience (CX) services to help them navigate complex transformations, we see similar physiological struggles firsthand. Let’s use a banking client overhauling its core mobile banking app to integrate an AI-powered financial wellness tool as an example.
They understand the massive benefits: hyper-personalized budgeting, automated savings transfers, and a better overall member experience. Yet, the branch tellers and loan officers, seasoned veterans with decades of face-to-face member relationships, push back. “Our members don't want a robot telling them how to save,” they'd say, relying on years of intuition. Their “gut” acting as their amygdala, screaming at them that their established expertise, their very sense of competence, is under threat.
The physiological resistance quickly translates into physical and emotional experiences. That internal team member who grumbled about the new platform? They might experience increased fatigue, irritability, or even minor physical ailments like headaches. The stress of constant cognitive effort to adapt can be draining.
In our Banking client example, the resistance manifests as a reluctance to demo the new app for members, passive-aggressive comments in internal forums, and an overall dip in team morale. The human brain, in its effort to conserve energy, defaults to the familiar. New habits require conscious effort, and that effort can be exhausting.
This is where the gradual nature of change, like evolution, usually offers a buffer. Over millennia, species adapt slowly, subtly, giving time for new traits to become ingrained. Think of the gradual development of the human eye from simpler light-sensing organs. There's time to adapt, to lean in, to integrate.
But what happens when that gradual change suddenly accelerates, or when a slow burn explodes into an immediate inferno?
Even after a period of ramping up, when a significant event occurs, we still default back to that primal physiological response. Consider losing someone you care for deeply. Even an elderly person who may have been ill for some time, and whose peaceful parting you might have even, in moments of compassion, longed for. But now that it happens, the brain struggles to grapple with the profound change it presents. The physical absence, the void, triggers a deeply rooted sense of loss and disorientation, despite any mental preparation. The new reality hasn't yet forged new neural pathways; the old ones, however painful, are still dominant.
At work, it’s similar.
You might know for months that a major organizational restructuring is coming, or that a key project is being re-prioritized. You've had time to mentally prepare. Yet, when the announcement finally drops, or the new directive is given, the immediate emotional and physical toll can still be significant. The familiar landscape shifts, and even if you logically understand the "why," your brain still screams, "Danger! Unknown!"
This brings us to the paradigm-shifting disruption: AI.
The promise of AI is immense - it gives us the power to do more of what we love, automating the mundane, accelerating discovery, and unlocking unprecedented creativity. Imagine AI as your ultimate co-pilot, handling the tedious data entry so you can focus on strategic problem-solving or artistic creation. The catalyst for making you and your work better.
But the juxtaposition is stark: the profound benefit comes with an equally profound threat to human relevance at work.
This isn't just about jobs being replaced; it's about the very definition of human skill and value being re-evaluated. The fear that comes with this is palpable and rooted in that same ancient physiological response. If my skills are automated, if my role becomes obsolete, what then?
It's an existential threat to our professional identity, and our brains react accordingly.
This is just the beginning.
Our next piece will dive deeper into the nuances of resistance to change and offer concrete strategies for overcoming it, both for our internal teams and our valued clients in this exciting, and sometimes (maybe) terrifying, AI era.
Disclaimer: The main body of this article was ideated, researched, and structured by a human. An AI tool was used for writing refinement, with the final content reviewed and edited by the author.
Claire Burge discusses our thinking framework, a model for thoroughness in thinking and how it affects the product solutions we deliver.
Design thinking isn't just about logos, websites and all of the superficial elements of branding that make something look good.
It happens all the time. You hear a new word and all of a sudden you're reading and hearing it everywhere. It's called the frequency illusion.